FREE TOOL · HUMAN REVIEW

Item Review Lab

Review one item clearly: what it assesses, how it is written, and how you will review the answer and fairness. Keep a card to guide its improvement.

Use public or de-identified examples only. Your entries stay on this page, are not sent to TAS or an AI service, and are not saved automatically. Leaving or changing language clears them; download the card first.

1 · Item and contextItem type

Intended learning outcomeWhat should the learner demonstrate that they know or can do?Up to 1200 charactersAudience and contextLearning stage or level and the purpose of the item, without names or personal data.Up to 600 charactersQuestion or taskWrite one item with the instructions needed to answer it.Up to 2500 charactersOptions — one per lineAdd two to eight options. Do not enter material from a confidential or protected test.Up to 2500 charactersAnswer key or expected response elementsFor a short answer, explain acceptable responses and any partial-credit criteria.Up to 1500 charactersRationale for the answer and options or marking criteriaWhy is the answer acceptable? What understanding might each option reveal? Distinguish a hypothesis from evidence.Up to 1800 characters

2 · Review and record your basis

Choose the status that describes your own review. Record a rationale for Reviewed, or note what still needs checking. You can download an incomplete card with its gaps made explicit.

Alignment with learning

Does the item elicit the intended performance at an appropriate content and thinking level?

Review status: Alignment with learningRationale or verification needed: Alignment with learning

Clarity of question and instructions

Is the task clear, with necessary information and without ambiguity or unintended clues?

Review status: Clarity of question and instructionsRationale or verification needed: Clarity of question and instructions

Options and plausibility

For multiple choice: is there a clear intended key and plausible, consistently worded options? For a short answer, choose Not applicable and optionally explain why.

Review status: Options and plausibilityRationale or verification needed: Options and plausibility

Answer key and marking

Can the key be justified? Are acceptable responses and partial-credit criteria clear where needed?

Review status: Answer key and markingRationale or verification needed: Answer key and marking

Fairness and accessibility

Are language, context and presentation suitable, without barriers unrelated to the intended learning? What needs learner feedback or another reviewer?

Review status: Fairness and accessibilityRationale or verification needed: Fairness and accessibility

3 · Revision and next verificationRevised wording — optionalRecord a proposed revision; do not present it as a result of a trial that has not taken place.Next verification stepWhat will you review with a colleague or a small trial? What evidence do you still need?

Your review card

Draft for human review

Some fields or reviews still need completion. Gaps are shown in the card and do not prevent downloading your draft.

TAS | Item Review Lab
Single-item review card
User-authored draft for human review
This is a human review card for one item, not an automated quality verdict or test certification. It does not establish validity, reliability or statistical fairness; those may require specialist review, piloting and suitable data.

Item type: Multiple choice

Intended learning outcome
[Empty field — needs completion]

Audience and context
[Empty field — needs completion]

Question or task
[Empty field — needs completion]

Options — one per line
[Empty field — needs completion]

Answer key or expected response elements
[Empty field — needs completion]

Rationale for the answer and options or marking criteria
[Empty field — needs completion]

Revised wording — optional
[Empty field — needs completion]

Next verification step
[Empty field — needs completion]

Human review record
Alignment with learning
Not reviewed yet
[No note recorded]

Clarity of question and instructions
Not reviewed yet
[No note recorded]

Options and plausibility
Not reviewed yet
[No note recorded]

Answer key and marking
Not reviewed yet
[No note recorded]

Fairness and accessibility
Not reviewed yet
[No note recorded]

Completion and verification needs
Intended learning outcome · Audience and context · Question or task · Answer key or expected response elements · Rationale for the answer and options or marking criteria · Next verification step · At least two multiple-choice options · Alignment with learning · Clarity of question and instructions · Options and plausibility · Answer key and marking · Fairness and accessibility

https://tareqabushawish.com/item-review

This is a human review card for one item, not an automated quality verdict or test certification. It does not establish validity, reliability or statistical fairness; those may require specialist review, piloting and suitable data.